From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:38:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] rebase -i: write better reflog messages
Message-ID: <CALkWK0==+Zs-Ej92VsHnF60_=RTigkKo+3xLew3JdavC3fbzoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v38sf40my.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Why did this have to change back from branch-reflog-test to branch1
> (which I used by mistake in "how about this" patch, but fixed in the
> version queued on 'pu')?
>
> The reason I did not use 'branch1' in the version I queued on 'pu'
> is because rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query, when merged on top of
> this, makes an assumption on where branch1 is in the test and
> fliping its tip here will break it.

Oh, okay.  Then just tweak before applying, if you don't mind?