From: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:49:25 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: initial_to and initial_reply_to are both optional
Message-ID: <CALaEz9WpL4+712vTrkes6EvBkr3ksnFgb6C_Hm8PdHQTtaZR+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vr4qe26gz.fsf_-_@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> We may pick up additional recipients from the format-patch output
> files we are sending, in which case it is perfectly valid to leave
> the @initial_to empty when the prompt asks.  We may want to start
> a new discussion thread without replying to anything, and it is
> valid to leave $initial_reply_to empty.
>
> An earlier update to avoid y@example.com stuffed in address fields
> did not take these two cases into account.
>
> Noticed and fix suggested by Stephen Boyd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> ---
>
>  * I am tempted to queue this, after asking you to eyeball it, and
>    then update the author to pass the blame to you before merging it
>    to 'next'.
>

Looks good, thanks.