From: Samuel Lijin <sxlijin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 21:17:21 GMT
Subject: Re: Diff topic branch + working copy changes?
Message-ID: <CAJZjrdX6iDQeAV4v7S=_OV6McNFe8Tax3sNUatwhrg+nEOR0jA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHd499DNa1zFm+ktWJb-4Rp09DjSc+p4HMqoHiXDj57muwxukw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Would be nice in the future to have another revision specification
> like @{wc} for "HEAD + working copy". I guess this technically isn't a
> revision, but something along those lines. Or maybe just an
> --include-wc for diff or something.

I think the spec would *just* be the working tree, if it ever got
implemented - I don't think it makes much sense to say "HEAD + working
copy".

Maybe something like this would do what you want?

# Diff Merge Base

dmb = "!f() { : git diff ; ref=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD); git
reset --soft $(git merge-base @{upstream} HEAD); git diff; git reset
--soft \"$ref\"; }; f"