From: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:49:15 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default
Message-ID: <CAHkcotimwxg3aRxYzHx-3a1THsc=oX83qrmGswZVJnKa3R86ww@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vpqcfqefy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> ... However, if I do
>> "git push A ..." as you suggested then A will accumulate old garabage
>> from B very quickly.
>
> That is not a valid excuse, is it?

Maybe not, but so far I have never had any problem with the way I use now.
So I have not had any real insensitive to change that. Though I agree that
what you proposed is better except pruning deleted branches.

> It only shows that lack of "push --prune A" is a problem to be solved.
>
> And hasn't it been solved already?
>

Has it? Somehow I cannot find the corresponding option in the manual.
What did I miss?

Dmitry