From: John Tapsell Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:12:04 GMT Subject: Re: git reflog --date Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Great - now I just need to persuade someone very nice nicely.. :-) On 21 October 2014 19:06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > John Tapsell writes: > >> For me, writing "git reflog @{now}" is a lot less intuitive than "git >> reflog --date" >> >> Currently the top google search for this question is here: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17369254/is-there-a-way-to-cause-git-reflog-to-show-a-date-alongside-each-entry >> >> Which doesn't mention "@{now}" at all. > > I would say that a site where cluelesses attempt to lead other > cluelesses is not the best source of information ;-), but that tells > us that either our docs are not read by people or they do not give > necessary information to them clearly enough. > >> My opinion: >> >> 1. Add --date as an option to reflog. Perhaps using the log.date >> format as the default. >> 2. Document --date in the man page for "git reflog" >> 3. Document @{now} in the man page for "git reflog" >> >> Sound good? > > The order of changes is questionable, but other than that, I think > that would be a good way forward.