From: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 13:57:54 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] Add Travis CI support
Message-ID: <CAHGBnuOmZFYUXKRnydUZSouOuJ59QU8K_=FvQG0xkQ+TywFPew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BE90093A-90AA-4E63-9664-C5ABCDE6B410@gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

>> I think running different configuration per branch makes sense, yes.
>
> If the list decides to accept this patch. Do you think that would be a necessary requirement for the first iteration?

No. I think this could be addressed later as an improvements. To me
it's more important to finally get *some* sane Travis CI configuration
in.

-- 
Sebastian Schuberth