From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:05:08 GMT Subject: Re: Malformed branch name in fast-export when specifying non-HEAD/branch revision Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20110822175705.GB1945@sigill.intra.peff.net> Heya, On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:57, Jeff King wrote: > I just read through the remote-helper threads from early June, and the > only mention of triggering that is when you actually have a rename > (i.e., your "refs/heads/foo" becomes remote's "refs/heads/bar", but we > mention "refs/heads/foo" in the export stream). I was thinking there was > another case, but I couldn't find mention of it. The patches Dscho and I sent are in response to the RFC patches (that are currently "stalled" in whats-cooking) I added on top of the series that rerolled yours. > Yeah, the behavior of your patch looks fine to me. I thought the point > in contention was that having export understand refspecs would fix a lot > of _other_ cases, too. Right. Sadly it doesn't look like I'll have time to try and fix 'git bundle' anytime soon, so this'll remain broken. -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier