From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 02:15:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/3] protocol v2
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kbmdrZSXAwQAWDboBjA0Y8223WWOD_-M=wBkRHWpL6_hQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kayaD792tvfySQFXsmk==p=V4+aw+c79RM1eCZED-yzsQ@mail.gmail.com>

 On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with the value assessment of these patches 98%, but these
> bits can be taken as the "we have v2 server availble for you on the
> side, by the way" hint you mentioned in the older thread, I think.

The patches are not well polished (In fact they don't even compile :/),
but I think they may demonstrate the ideas and though process. And
as it turns out we'd not be following that spirit of ideas but rather want
to have a dedicated v2.

That said I did not want to spend lots of time to polish the patch for
inclusion but rather to demonstrate ideas, which can be done with
substantial less quality IMHO. Correct me if I am wrong here!

Thanks,
Stefan