From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:44:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/28] packed_ref_store: move `packed_refs_lock` member here
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kbavn0QdqaoJJ+DXh28OLb1jDgdqA01soawQZ86fp0XkA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bf1fcee3-2f2f-b153-5774-dee5b2a2790d@alum.mit.edu>

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> I chose that name because it is a `ref_store`, with `packed_` being a
> short prefix that tells what kind of `ref_store`.
>
> The next question is, why `ref_store` as opposed to `refs_store`? To me
> it sounds more natural in English for the reasons that you mentioned.

Yeah after some thought on language this sounds good to me, too.
I still have to work on natural. ;)