From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:57:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/14] Move libified code from builtin/apply.c to apply.{c,h}
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kb0gao2KJFi9X3V2ME+1-xnbuSNhjC14Vnn3oP-1ac35A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160827184547.4365-4-chriscool@tuxfamily.org>

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Christian Couder
<christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
> As most of the apply code in builtin/apply.c has been libified by a number of
> previous commits, it can now be moved to apply.{c,h}, so that more code can
> use it.
>
> Helped-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
> Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
> ---
>  apply.c         | 4731 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  apply.h         |   19 +
>  builtin/apply.c | 4733 +------------------------------------------------------

I deduce by roughly the same line count in the .c files, it is just
moving files over.
(On my todo list I have an idea how to make reviewing patches like this easier.)

>  3 files changed, 4751 insertions(+), 4732 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
> index 2eac3e3..7b96130 100644
> --- a/apply.c
> +++ b/apply.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
> +/*
> + * apply.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) Linus Torvalds, 2005

We're very inconsistent with the intellectual property log.
Sometimes we have that at the top of a file, sometimes we don't
and rather point at the git history to find out who touched the code.
I'd rather use the history instead of having a bunch of copyright lines.
So maybe consider to drop this introductory comment as a
{preparatory, follow up} cleanup?

(This is also a nit that doesn't require a reroll on its own)