From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 18:49:02 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] submodule.c: warn about missing submodule git directories
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kb0VEDxe0TAMf66nWk3pYMPxrpb_zFmoU4gezzswM5XSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180905191849.GB120842@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:18 PM Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
> > This is the continuation of f2d48994dc1 (submodule.c: submodule_move_head
> > works with broken submodules, 2017-04-18), which tones down the case of
> > "broken submodule" in case of a missing git directory of the submodule to
> > be only a warning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
> > ---
> >  submodule.c                   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >  t/t2013-checkout-submodule.sh |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> I don't understand what workflow this is a part of.
>
> If the submodule is missing, shouldn't we make it non-missing instead
> of producing a partial checkout that doesn't build?

No. checkout and friends do not want to touch the network
(unless we are in a partial clone world; that is the user is fully
aware that commands can use the network at totally unexpected
times)

So for that, all we can do is better error messages.

Stefan