From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:48:40 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] pathspec labels [WAS: submodule groups]
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kZyPvAFG1TjSm76LuDLpch=7iuL_-8LYqysSESFQj-YjQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh9dx3nsf.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Instead of putting everything in under the same attribute name
>>> "label", make one attribute per label? Would this work?
>>>
>>> *.[ch] c-group code-group
>>>
>>> And the pathspec magic name can be simply "attr", any git attribute
>>> can be used with it, e.g. :(attr:c-group)
>>
>> So you want to be able to query something like:
>>
>>     git ls-files ":(crlf=auto)"
>>
>> as well?
>
> It would be more like
>
>         git ls-files ":(attr:crlf=auto)"
>
> It certainly sounds tempting, even though I do not want to keep what
> this initial chunk of the series needs to do to the minimum.

This is another case for using ':' instead of '='.
So I think ':' is better for this future enhancement.

Also this future enhancement may ask for

      git ls-files ":(attr:label=foo)"

or

      git ls-files ":(attr:-label)"

so the user can circumvent the warn and ignore strategy. :(