From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:43:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] t6500: mark tests as SHA1 reliant
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kZxVhZjFmTs5oAXh_vBNix4G=LtL8zCjrFCnqS+5pkDwQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPc5daXgXpwOKB2J7cz7fFYNd3GuRK7fqeROhwouyaCCGU1ToA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> There is another one that is better suited for this demonstration patch,
> whose sole point is about creating bunch of objects that prefix conflicts
> with each other to test the abbreviation machinery.

'Another one' meaning in another test file? I'll go look for these
tests.

The first patch produces lots of false positives, so maybe I'll need
to work on that (is there another code path for sha1?).

Thanks,
Stefan