From: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:05:32 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] ls-files: only recurse on active submodules
Message-ID: <CAGZ79kZ8KV+c2StKR8tp=s_E1+uEaSezgsmUfyyO9HUrmzdT+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170413185707.97746-1-bmwill@google.com>

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> wrote:
> Add in a check to see if a submodule is active before attempting to
> recurse.  This prevents 'ls-files' from trying to operate on a submodule
> which may not exist in the working directory.

What would currently happen on recursing into non-active submodules?
Can we have a test for this?

Thanks,
Stefan