From: Deveshi Dwivedi <deveshigurgaon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 19:22:06 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] stash: infer "push" when push-specific options are given
Message-ID: <CAG7UgESxcbKb=Jzi36osBhD51KO9GvQr8esD=6BMupLAi33nWQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a280c7de-1357-44a9-afdd-bd473fd4e2a4@gmail.com>

> "create" accepts "-m" as well so that's not unique either. I agree with
> Junio's suggestion in the link above that we should assume "push" when
> there is no subcommand given and error out if we see an unsupported
> option. That does not require the arguments to be unique to "push". A
> complete implementation would also support negated options like "git
> stash --no-stage [<pathspec>]". What is implemented in this patch maybe
> sufficient in practice but it would be good to mention the limitations
> in the commit message.
>
> Thanks
>
> Phillip
Sure, I will send a v4 with an updated commit message. Thank you.