From: Yi, EungJun Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 12:52:11 GMT Subject: Re: Finding all branches(remote and local) include given commit? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1336826919.3002.18.camel@centaur.lab.cmartin.tk> > The branch command has had long-form since 1.7.8 That sounds good to me! Thanks for letting me know. 2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto : > On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 21:25 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote: >> Wow, I should do like this: >> >> $ git branch -a --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f >> * master >>   remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master >>   remotes/origin/master >>   remotes/origin/next >>   remotes/origin/pu >> >> git-branch has '-a' but not '-all', and git-remote has '--all' but not '-a'. > > The branch command has had long-form since 1.7.8 > >> >> This is a bit confusing for me. Why don't the two commands have the >> option under the same name? >> >> >> 2012/5/12 Carlos Martín Nieto : >> > On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 20:42 +0900, Yi, EungJun wrote: >> >> Is there any way to find remote and local branches include given commit? >> >> >> >> e.g. >> >> >> >> $ git branch --all --contains 499e7b31509cfbb59dcb2a046f8e2fd1a3e73d6f >> >> * master >> >>   remotes/origin/next >> >> >> >> As you know, it does not work and "git branch --contains" finds only >> >> local branches. >> > >> > Works For Me. What version are you trying it with? Are you sure that >> > remote-tracking branches do contain that commit? >> > >> > From a quick look through the log and release notes, it was never >> > mentioned as a fix. The log contains 3f7701a4 from 2007 which fixes 'git >> > describe --all --contains' which, though unlikely, might be related. >> > This commit was however part of release 1.5.4, which makes it unlikely >> > you'd be using something older. >> > >> >   cmn >> > >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > >