From: Ethan Reesor <firelizzard@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:11:21 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] shell: allow 'help' command to disable interactive shell
Message-ID: <CAE_TNi=fN66+9WfMn86H6J_BVAjFP=xiE8m3JHe_4ANHB2V5wA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130211060911.GH15329@elie.Belkin>

Why not have both? That way there is a way to get a customizable
response that avoids Junio's complaints and there is a way to do what
you are trying to achieve.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ethan Reesor wrote:
>
>>                        That way, there's a default setting, there can
>> be a system-wide message, there can be a user specific message, and
>> those messages can be set via `git-commit`.
>
> That won't let me imitate gitolite's behavior without a lot of
> config file churn:
>
>         $ ssh git@localhost
>         Hello, jrn.  This is git@elie running git-shell 1.8.1.3.
>
>          R W    path/to/one/repo
>          R      path/to/another/repo
>         $



--
Ethan Reesor (Gmail)