From: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:17:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fixup remaining cvsimport tests
Message-ID: <CAEUsAPbDTUXhz2BoDOwKCjcLS6BQA=jZ6DME4ZDfTDXRL=ZMqA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130120192412.GA7498@serenity.lan>

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:57:50AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> This is not a noise, though.
>>
>> Chris, how would we want to proceed?  I'd prefer at some point to
>> see cvsimport-3 to be in sync when the one patched and tested in
>> Eric's repository is proven enough.  Will Eric be the gatekeeper, or
>> will you be sending patches this way as well?
>
> In this case the patch was to the C portion of cvsps, not the Python
> cvs-import, so not relevant for this particular case.

Oh, I think I misunderstood the question.  The only time I passed a
patch specifically for git-cvsimport.py directly to Eric was before
the his patch was in Junio's repository.  Unless I'm mistaken, only
the second patch Eric sent was actually imported.  Subsequent to this
I would have submitted any patches for git-cvsimport.py directly to
the git list.  I just didn't have any--cvsps had several problems that
needed to be worked out before it made sense to look at the importer.

In other words, I don't think Eric should be a gatekeeper of this code.

Chris