From: Dave Borowitz Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:31:55 GMT Subject: Re: Bug: send-pack does not respect http.signingkey Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Dave Borowitz writes: > >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >>> Perhaps something like this? >> >> Seems like it should work. >> >> Jonathan had suggested there might be some principled reason why >> send-pack does not respect config options, and suggested passing it in >> as a flag. But that would be more work, certainly, as it would also >> have to get passed through git-remote-http somehow. > > I actually was wondering about exactly the same thing as Jonathan, > and that is where my "Perhaps" came from. I will say, though, as the maintainer of a handful of custom remote helpers, I would prefer a solution that does not involve changing the implementation of those just to pass this configuration through. So my vote would be for send-pack to respect the normal config options. Not sure what that would mean for -c on the command line, though.