From: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@google.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 18:46:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] pack-protocol.txt: Mark LF in command-list as optional
Message-ID: <CAD0k6qRosOZqnmQ=HW6FWYV5pi-HYCK0wYgHnpQkD5R5eRSoug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kY-T8k7GjCUxKh5p_bf_t1+M8jRoBPDFp0hpExYmE8y=g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
> I think the problem with this part of the documentation is its ambiguity on
> what exactly we want to document. The sender SHOULD put an LF, while
> the receiver MUST NOT assume the LF is there always, so I guess it's best
> to mark it optional from a receivers point of view.

To be clear, this patch is a partial fix to one particular spec in the
file. See 1/7 for the general warning not to trust these. Auditing the
file completely was not the goal of this series.