From: Dave Borowitz <dborowitz@google.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 19:26:26 GMT
Subject: Re: Working towards a common review format for git
Message-ID: <CAD0k6qQLM=Fh_FGU6JN8=52Kjab6AqMfFTaK7DiNYgpWa5nJpg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160108192339.GA3514@salo>

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Richard Ipsum
<richard.ipsum@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>> You know what would probably also be a good idea would be to spec out
>> the entire format in a standalone document. That way when Gerrit
>> doesn't have something implemented, it's clear that Gerrit is wrong,
>> not that it's trying to fork the format.
>
> I think that would be good, I could attempt to write a spec for the format
> and post it here for review? I expect I'll want to work a little more on
> perl-notedb before I do that though.

Sure. I don't want to necessarily make more work for you, but it's
probably a good exercise to have someone write a spec who did not also
write the first implementation :)

You may post it here but you would probably get more feedback on
repo-discuss@googlegroups.com.