From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:50:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] lockfile.c: remove PATH_MAX limitation (except in resolve_symlink)
Message-ID: <CACsJy8DtYrP4CndD+Ud2qpYT3J7NehukL9a_sgiq7vZ82KH-0g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <232C089CF449490C9F5B398996DD314C@PhilipOakley>

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> wrote:
> From: "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
>
>> Something extra is, because struct lock_file is usually used as static
>> variables in many places. This patch reduces bss section by about 80k
>> bytes (or 23%) on Linux.
>
>
> This didn't scan for me. Perhaps it's the punctuation. Maybe:
>
> Additionally, because the struct lock_file variables are [were] in many
> places static, this patch reduces the bss section size by about 80k
>
> bytes (or 23%) on Linux.
>
> Does my tweak reflect your intent?

Yes. But I should probably put that below the "---" line. We're not
busybox. 80k is pratically nothing.
-- 
Duy