From: Duy Nguyen Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:38:49 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 24/24] t1406: new tests for submodule ref store Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <51f2ba5a-38c9-17eb-e845-3a84b65c7029@alum.mit.edu> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > The for-each-ref iteration is defined to be sorted by refname, but it's > true that the for-each-reflog order is undefined. Thanks. I'm going to add a few lines about this near for_each_ref and for_each_reflog() then, assuming that this is the desired behavior, not a bug. (Another patch, because I'm not happy until it gets 30+) -- Duy