From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 02:16:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 18/27] files-backend: replace submodule_allowed check in files_downcast()
Message-ID: <CACsJy8CpUzRjZG7V8a6XvzcjxhwTnAfpwYed3OSLrygUPOK66g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <004082a0-871f-cd41-edc5-522b5c2b3b58@alum.mit.edu>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> +/* ref_store_init flags */
>> +#define REF_STORE_READ               (1 << 0)
>
> I asked [1] in reply to v5 whether `REF_STORE_READ` is really necessary
> but I don't think you replied. Surely a reference store that we can't
> read would be useless? Can't we just assume that any `ref_store` is
> readable and drop this constant?

I deleted it then I realized many lines like these

    files_downcast(ref_store, REF_STORE_READ, "read_raw_ref");

would become

    files_downcast(ref_store, 0, "read_raw_ref");

I think for newcomers, the former gives a better hint what the second
argument is than a plain zero in the latter, so I'm inclined to keep
it.
-- 
Duy