From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:19:02 GMT
Subject: Re: Git and SHA-1 security (again)
Message-ID: <CACsJy8C+2=qv5Vu=tGeDTK_Q+XSAv3qEJw0nrHbEWU7psDf=Cg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160717142157.GA6644@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 4:21 PM, brian m. carlson
<sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:01:38AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> Out of curiosity: have you considered something like padding the SHA-1s
>> with, say 0xa1, to the size of the new hash and using that padding to
>> distinguish between old vs new hash?
>
> I'm going to end up having to do something similar because of the issue
> of submodules.  Submodules may still be SHA-1, while the main repo may
> be a newer hash.  I was going to zero-pad, however.  I was also, at
> least at first, going to force a separate .git dir for those, to avoid
> having to try to store two separate types of objects in the same repo.

If it's just the external hash representation, can we go with a prefix
<algo><colon> to identify the hash algorithm? For example
sha256:1234... is SHA-256 while 1235... by default is SHA-1 (but we
could switch the default to SHA-256 via config file later SHA-1 is
dead and nobody wants to type sha256: every time). It catches
incorrect hash algorithm references.
-- 
Duy