From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:03:41 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] gc --aggressive: three phase repacking
Message-ID: <CACsJy8BVmc0K5Rdr_putTQM5Hs2agizyW8cxAPFLb0LnXntG7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8CU3JyL74OuurjDr5-FHmBOCRahtXukukCqGx1cTdjvMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>             size  time
>>> old aggr.   36MB  5m51
>>> new aggr.   37MB  6m13
>>> repack -adf 48MB  1m12
>>
>> I am not clear on what these times mean. It looks like the new code is
>> slower _and_ bigger. Can you explain them?
>
> That's right :) The upside is faster operations, which is complely
> missed here. The good thing from those numbers is pack size does not
> increase much (the upper limit would be repack -adf with default
> settings).

Something is not right. The performance numbers are against me. Still looking..
-- 
Duy