From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 10:58:54 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-push.txt: mention about remote.*.push when no refspec is given
Message-ID: <CACsJy8BNpMN3-Y1eZrJXpZp3-KU=kDN_4eM=87OD9d7yYYrHCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v8v60qu2i.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> I agree that saying what it is, what it does or what it is for
> upfront (i.e. "Specifies what are pushed") before how it is spelled
> is an improvement.  I however think describing "If not specified"
> here was a mistake, and you are making it worse by burying the
> description of what happens when <refspec>... are missing in the
> middle of the description for <refspec>...
>
> I would rather see this done in the direction the attached "how
> about doing it this way" patch illustrates.  The way how "where" and
> "what" are determined when the command line does not specify is the
> proparty of the entire command, not of an individual parameter.

I agree your patch looks better than mine. Put it on 'pu', perhaps?
-- 
Duy