From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:53:08 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC 0/16] Introduce index file format version 5 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20120802134718.GA1000@tgummerer.unibz.it> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > On 08/02, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Gummerer wrote: >> > Documentation/technical/index-file-format-v5.txt | 281 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > builtin/update-index.c | 5 +- >> > cache-tree.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++ >> > cache-tree.h | 7 + >> > cache.h | 96 +++++++++++- >> > read-cache.c | 1519 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >> > resolve-undo.c | 129 ++++++++++++++++ >> > resolve-undo.h | 3 + >> > t/perf/p0002-index.sh | 33 ++++ >> > t/t2104-update-index-skip-worktree.sh | 15 +- >> > t/t3700-add.sh | 1 + >> > test-index-version.c | 2 +- >> > 12 files changed, 2082 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-) >> >> This is not good (too many pluses in read-cache.c) if it comes from >> format-patch. Does it? > > No this comes from git diff --stat. It's probably just my terminal > width then? > Ah ok. Recent git learns to use much screen estate as possible but format-patch keep it fit wihtin 75 or so columns. -- Duy