From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 01:05:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] match_basename: use strncmp instead of strcmp
Message-ID: <CACsJy8An08kFz4iCa-0U8Q30jUNqKzfZHK_jNdXOtnzqqRJEdg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALWbr2w71DsORxsFBBj4N2wzYQomjvCqxGfovbTDjGAT9eASyQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>> --- a/dir.c
>> +++ b/dir.c
>> @@ -636,12 +636,14 @@ int match_basename(const char *basename, int basenamelen,
>>                    int flags)
>>  {
>>         if (prefix == patternlen) {
>> -               if (!strcmp_icase(pattern, basename))
>> +               if (patternlen == basenamelen &&
>> +                   !strncmp_icase(pattern, basename, patternlen))
>>                         return 1;
>>         } else if (flags & EXC_FLAG_ENDSWITH) {
>>                 if (patternlen - 1 <= basenamelen &&
>> -                   !strcmp_icase(pattern + 1,
>> -                                 basename + basenamelen - patternlen + 1))
>> +                   !strncmp_icase(pattern + 1,
>> +                                  basename + basenamelen - patternlen + 1,
>> +                                  patternlen - 1))
>>                         return 1;
>
>
> I can see that you kept strncmp(), was it worse with memcmp() ?

One step at a time. 05/13 replace strncmp_icase with memcmp (for when
ignore_case == 0).
-- 
Duy