From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:20:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/19] Documentation/config: add splitIndex.maxPercentChange
Message-ID: <CACsJy8AV7mYDsod=BedAsy9W=tNpZg2kpzQ5HBTAmE-WcdroDA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD2VFQs2X14omWEy-iJzEeTEeEOa+fxMEq3HTQK3rFyuCg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Christian Couder
<christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
> So if we now mix things up just to avoid one more configuration
> option, we could very well make things harder to develop, to
> configure, to parse and to understand later, so it is not a trade off
> worth making.

OK since we're still in the early phase of determining how to
re-split, I guess going with elaborate, precise configuration is
better, even if it's more config options. Once we know better, maybe
we can decide a good default cover-all "auto" then (or maybe not
because we find out no shoe fits all).
-- 
Duy