From: Duy Nguyen Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:14:19 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Multiple worktrees vs. submodules fixes Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Hmph. I was hoping that the multiple-work-trees topic was ready for > 'next' by now, but we may want to wait to see how the interaction > with submodule plays out to have another chance of a clean reroll > before it happens. This is a topic with large impact and is quite > intrusive code-wise, even though the intrusive parts are cleanly > done. So we'd want to take more time to unleash it to the general > public than more usual small scale topics, anyway. Originally I wanted to get it merged without submodule support, but I failed to spot the local_repo_env problem and could have caused a regression for submodules. So yeah delaying the series does not sound bad. Not sure about the reroll (i.e. rewriting current patches). I think putting patches on top with explanation is better. But we can keep it in 'pu' and see if we really need to reroll. -- Duy