From: Paul Tan Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 08:07:05 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] t5520: check reflog action in fast-forward merge Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8e51ff8168d050cb2f8fedd4464b2f7b@www.dscho.org> Hi, On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 2015-05-18 15:32, Paul Tan wrote: > >> @@ -95,7 +94,11 @@ test_expect_success 'test . as a remote' ' >> git checkout copy && >> test "$(cat file)" = file && >> git pull && >> - test "$(cat file)" = updated >> + test "$(cat file)" = updated && >> + git reflog -1 >reflog.actual && >> + sed "s/$_x05[0-9a-f]*/OBJID/g" reflog.actual >reflog.fuzzy && > > Actually, let's use "s/^[0-9a-f]*/OBJID/" instead: you only want to replace the first few characters. Did you mean "s/^$_x05[0-9a-f]*/OBJID/"? (with "$_x05" expanding to '[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]' from test-lib.sh). If not, then it would match even if there was no SHA1 hash. But yes, without the "^" there will very likely be false positives. Thanks for catching. >> @@ -106,7 +109,11 @@ test_expect_success 'the default remote . should >> not break explicit pull' ' >> git reset --hard HEAD^ && >> test "$(cat file)" = file && >> git pull . second && >> - test "$(cat file)" = modified >> + test "$(cat file)" = modified && >> + git reflog -1 >reflog.actual && >> + sed "s/$_x05[0-9a-f]*/OBJID/g" reflog.actual >reflog.fuzzy && > > Same here. Regards, Paul