From: Elijah Newren Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 03:48:34 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] promisor-remote: teach lazy-fetch in any repo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: A quick update... On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 2:35 PM Elijah Newren wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 2:38 PM Jonathan Tan wrote: > > ... > > diff --git a/object-file.c b/object-file.c > > index f233b440b2..ebf273e9e7 100644 > > --- a/object-file.c > > +++ b/object-file.c > > @@ -1570,15 +1570,12 @@ static int do_oid_object_info_extended(struct repository *r, > > } > > > > /* Check if it is a missing object */ > > - if (fetch_if_missing && has_promisor_remote() && > > - !already_retried && r == the_repository && > > + if (fetch_if_missing && repo_has_promisor_remote(r) && > > + !already_retried && > > So here you removed the special check against the_repository while > looking for promisor_remotes. There are other such special checks in > the code; I also see: > > diff.c: if (options->repo == the_repository && has_promisor_remote() && > diffcore-break.c: if (r == the_repository && has_promisor_remote()) { > diffcore-rename.c: if (r == the_repository && has_promisor_remote()) { > > and a series I'm planning to submit soon will add another to merge.ort.c. > > Do these need to all be fixed as part of the partial clone submodule > support as well? Do I need to change anything about my series? I > guess since I'm asking that, I should probably submit it first so you > can actually see it and answer my question. (And the timing may be > good since the area is fresh in your memory...) That other topic is now over here: https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.969.git.1622856485.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/T/#t