From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:38:55 GMT
Subject: Re: Gerrit, GitButler, and Jujutsu projects collaborating on change-id commit footer
Message-ID: <CABPp-BFr+4iy7awessWSY8NzzswY1-=30L4VvOZMpFDoOxJUgg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D8X571K4M77Y.2PVKK2KQCRBOM@buenzli.dev>

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 9:25 AM Remo Senekowitsch <remo@buenzli.dev> wrote:
>
> On Thu Apr 3, 2025 at 5:56 PM CEST, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 2:13 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> >>
> >>   - Extending revisions to allow specifying commits by change ID.
> >
> > Would this essentially be similar to <rev>^{/<text>} except searching
> > specifically change-id headers rather than commit message?
>
> One benefit of using the "reverse-hex" format (hex with a different
> alphabet: z(0) through k(25)) we're proposing is that it allows a
> change-id or its prefix to be used in the same place as a commit hash,
> without ambiguity.

I already saw that, but this doesn't address my question.