From: Guanglin Xu Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:57:18 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] branch.c: change install_branch_config() to use skip_prefix() Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Hi Eric, Yes, you're right. "!!" is comfortably concise and also idiomatic in Git sources. Thanks, Guanglin 2014-03-03 16:12 GMT+08:00 Eric Sunshine : > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Guanglin Xu wrote: >> to avoid a magic code of 11. >> >> Helped-by: Sun He >> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine >> Helped-by: Jacopo Notarstefano >> >> Signed-off-by: Guanglin Xu >> --- >> >> This is an implementation of the idea#2 of GSoC 2014 microproject. >> >> branch.c | 8 ++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c >> index 723a36b..4eec0ac 100644 >> --- a/branch.c >> +++ b/branch.c >> @@ -49,8 +49,12 @@ static int should_setup_rebase(const char *origin) >> >> void install_branch_config(int flag, const char *local, const char *origin, const char *remote) >> { >> - const char *shortname = remote + 11; >> - int remote_is_branch = starts_with(remote, "refs/heads/"); >> + const char *shortname = skip_prefix(remote ,"refs/heads/"); >> + int remote_is_branch; >> + if (NULL == shortname) >> + remote_is_branch = 0; >> + else >> + remote_is_branch = 1; > > A bit verbose. Perhaps just: > > int remote_is_branch = !!shortname; > > which you will find to be idiomatic in this project. > >> struct strbuf key = STRBUF_INIT; >> int rebasing = should_setup_rebase(origin); >> >> -- >> 1.9.0