From: Edward Thomson <ethomson@edwardthomson.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:03:38 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Allow overriding the default name of the default branch
Message-ID: <CA+WKDT2DV6ymu-AG9B2h34=K+4KW7tcCpAfTV-rTdifqfS7R=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200629224113.GC9782@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:42 PM brian m. carlson
<sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
>
> I'm very happy with this and the way it's progressed since v1.  This
> seems simpler than earlier designs, and I appreciate the improved focus
> on avoiding special-casing branches, since I think that will make it
> easier for folks to choose branch naming that suits them.
>
> Thanks for working on this.

I agree, this is an improvement.

One thing that isn't obvious to me, though, is why templates take
precedence over the command-line option.  I would expect the command-line
option to be the highest priority option given, just like configuration
values specified on the command-line override values from configuration
files.

Cheers-
-ed