From: Ivan Tse <ivan.tse1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 01:39:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] refs: return conflict error when checking packed refs
Message-ID: <CA+WCWMxmpjeYfUGb=eymFF-xD7mopP0nVMSh+KHhOtrYU_euFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOLa=ZTu1to4HRc8sD2BcA+1ZzgcnXW9nHb1gg_VEG=nLOjHvg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Karthik!

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 9:37 AM Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Ivan,
>
[snip]
>
> That's correct, my question was merely that we also have a
> `refs_verify_refname_available` function call there and was wondering if
> we somehow need to catch and propagate the same error from there. Like
> you mentioned the way it is currently structured doesn't make that
> possible.

Ah I see, that makes sense. Thanks for the clarification and for the
initial question!