From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:51:15 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18] t5613: use test_must_fail
Message-ID: <CA+P7+xqnSt5qe4OLi2kDO9+y_keyFtVK2=qx4Q5skusBWXD31Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161003203401.d4awnljukgqbku2n@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> Besides being our normal style, this correctly checks for an
> error exit() versus signal death.
>

Another very simple but obvious improvement.

Regards,
Jake

> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
>  t/t5613-info-alternate.sh | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t5613-info-alternate.sh b/t/t5613-info-alternate.sh
> index 4548fb0..65074dd 100755
> --- a/t/t5613-info-alternate.sh
> +++ b/t/t5613-info-alternate.sh
> @@ -46,10 +46,9 @@ git clone -l -s F G &&
>  git clone --bare -l -s G H'
>
>  test_expect_success 'invalidity of deepest repository' \
> -'cd H && {
> -       git fsck
> -       test $? -ne 0
> -}'
> +'cd H &&
> +test_must_fail git fsck
> +'
>
>  cd "$base_dir"
>
> @@ -75,7 +74,8 @@ cd "$base_dir"
>  test_expect_success 'that info/alternates is necessary' \
>  'cd C &&
>  rm -f .git/objects/info/alternates &&
> -! (git fsck)'
> +test_must_fail git fsck
> +'
>
>  cd "$base_dir"
>
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ cd "$base_dir"
>  test_expect_success \
>      'that relative alternate is only possible for current dir' '
>      cd D &&
> -    ! (git fsck)
> +    test_must_fail git fsck
>  '
>
>  cd "$base_dir"
> --
> 2.10.0.618.g82cc264
>