From: Jacob Keller Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 21:20:04 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/8] [DO NOT APPLY, but improve?] rebase--interactive: introduce "stop" command Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20180118183618.39853-3-sbeller@google.com> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Stefan Beller wrote: > Jake suggested using "x false" instead of "edit" for some corner cases. > > I do prefer using "x false" for all kinds of things such as stopping > before a commit (edit only let's you stop after a commit), and the > knowledge that "x false" does the least amount of actions behind my back. > > We should have that command as well, maybe? > I agree. I use "x false" very often, and I think stop is probably a better solution since it avoids spawning an extra shell that will just fail. Not sure if stop implies too much about "stop the whole thing" as opposed to "stop here and let me do something manual", but I think it's clear enough. Thanks, Jake > Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller > --- > git-rebase--interactive.sh | 1 + > sequencer.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh > index 3cd7446d0b..9eac53f0c5 100644 > --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh > +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh > @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ l, label