From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:51:59 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] t5800: document some non-functional parts of remote helpers
Message-ID: <BANLkTinP2bnREuok6ptc7oBKdiPfqUqG_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110608193630.GH27715@elie>

Heya,

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 21:36, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gah!  Clearly I am not thinking straight and it means the
> transport-helper.

Yup.

> ... the level of permissible hackishness goes down :), making teaching
> fast-export about refspecs the only obviously reasonable fix at first
> glance.

Or, as I mentioned in the nearby thread, by having
fast-import/fast-export not modify any refs at all, and do that
separately.

>> Anyway, I don't think this should be in the commit message for the new
>> test which doesn't even know about the remote helper protocol. :)
>
> Sorry for the nonsense.  At least this last part still applies.

Sure, this was just a resend of Peff's patch, it does need a new
commit message :).

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier