From: Michael Witten Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:14:20 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] Date Mode: Add --time-zone; deprecate --date=local Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7v62q8z824.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:50, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Michael Witten writes: > >>> I think the intent of this series is good. See also this thread from >>> quite a while back: >>> >>>  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/112026 >> >> I took a cursory look, but I've spent so much time on this series already >> that I don't really care what it says... > > This is not a very good way to motivate somebody who is already tired at > the end of the day to reivew the RFC series, I would have to say. Then you can save us both time and just apply my series immediately :-P You're taking it wholly out of context; the full sentence is indeed: "I took a cursory look, but I've spent so much time on this series already that I don't really care what it says; if there are particular concerns that you think I might not have met, then let me know in this discussion :-)" Two points, though: * Mentioning another thread is not in any way a review of this current patch series. * I'm passed the phase of worrying about which cases I might have missed; that's why I have submitted my work to the list in order to give less-weary eyes a chance to think about it.