From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 19:20:32 GMT
Subject: Re: Creating remote branch called HEAD corrupts remote clones
Message-ID: <BANLkTik18oTdNa1A99QAXJ9vz105jC3gLA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimHfH-o6Fyoo61xVFxAhELNmD=4xg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Stephen Kelly <steveire@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> No, it's still an issue, and I believe I pin-pointed it in my first
>>> mail. You can try out the patch I sent, and see if that helps in your
>>> case. If it does, I think it'd make sense to do something (preferably
>>> a bit more robust) with it.
>
> I don't have a build of git at the moment to test it as I'm using
> distro packages again. The only test case I have is the alice and bob
> stuff already posted, so if your patch fixes that for you that's good
> enough from my POV.

As I said, 'gitk --all' works fine, the patch would fix 'gitk'.

-- 
Felipe Contreras