From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:15:41 GMT
Subject: Re: svn-fe status
Message-ID: <AANLkTinv51AjZ4c7cgqhCzJgWDZOCOXHPsraEPXvLUgR@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100927025458.GA8921@burratino>

Heya,

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 04:54, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> We can peek ahead to make sure
>
>  C :72 branches/topic/README
>
> still copies a file named ":72".

Yes, I guess so, we have the entire line available when parsing, so
that shouldn't be a problem.

> For completeness it probably does make sense to allow
>
>  cat <dataref> <path>
>
> too, with <dataref> pointing to a tree (as before) or to a tag or
> commit.  I just suspect svn-fe would not use it.

I'd prefer to have one way to do it, then again, I don't use perl ;).

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier