From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:21:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/160] [PULL] Update ab/i18n (again)
Message-ID: <AANLkTinjwP+UjVstEZ-ny75t5=R3dQfxF2VThooVzSGW@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinMkc6nH2+tLBVym7pSSzvTEBbgiqJSD5w3G3kz@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 19:36, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 19:26, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Oops, I didn't try running "make doc". I could write a
>>> Documentation/git-sh-i18n.txt manpage, but it would probably be better
>>> to just remove the patch adding it to command-list.txt, no?
>>
>> If it is not a documented end-user level command, it shouldn't be in the
>> list.
>
> Ok. I've ejected that patch out for now, and fixed a two minor bugs
> One NO_GETTEXT_POISON test was in the wrong patch, and I completely
> removed the test that checked that $GIT_ROOT/share/locale wasn't there
> under NO_GETTEXT=YesPlease from the series altogether.
>
> I've updated the ab/i18n ref at GitHub, you can pull that.

I ran exhaustive tests on it, i.e. checked out each commit in the
series and ran the whole test suite on each one, with both
GETTEXT_POISON= and GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease. That turned a few minor
issues that I fixed.

The result can be pulled from ab/i18n at git://github.com/avar/git.git
like before.

I'm *really* done fiddling with it now. At least for *this* pull request :)