From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:30:01 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/73] No-op gettextize core Git C programs
Message-ID: <AANLkTinRfACQuCki=QJh4dczoMK8+8bdwLjg6atL4UBT@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vwrkra5un.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 02:37, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>   * Reverted back to using the "gettextize" patch subjects I
>>>     originally used. I'm using these consistetly so I can later git
>>>     log --grep=gettextize: to find them. I'd like to preserve that
>>>     attributed.
>>
>> Can we make that shorter, perhaps just "i18n:"?  In this series, your
>> first three and Jonathan's are oddballs that do not have "gettexize:"
>> anyway.
>>
>> Will give it a whirl.  Thanks.
>
> It was a slightly unpleasant experience to merge this round to 'pu' (after
> excluding the earlier round from it, of course), as a few topics in flight
> that reorganized existing functions into smaller helpers had to conflict
> with this patch.  I tried to be careful but please double check the result,
> perhaps with:
>
>    $ git show --first-parent origin/pu
>
> when it is propagated to mirrors.

I've gone over the version in pu. It looks good to me.