From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:50:30 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch: don't output non-errors on stderr Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20100626164618.GA18517@coredump.intra.peff.net> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 16:46, Jeff King wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:14:59PM +0000, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 06:13, Jeff King wrote: >> >> > Or even easier: is there a reason that "git fetch -q" would not do what >> > you (Ævar) want? >> >> That'd reduce the verbosity level, which'd skip some messages that I >> might want. E.g.: >> >>               if (verbosity >= 0) { >>                       fprintf(stderr, " x %-*s %-*s -> %s\n", >>                               TRANSPORT_SUMMARY_WIDTH, "[deleted]", >>                               REFCOL_WIDTH, "(none)", prettify_refname(ref->name)); > > Wait, what? Isn't that line also part of the same human-readable status > table? What makes the status of a pruned ref any different than the > status of an updated ref? I don't see how that is an error message, but > the other lines are not. I misread that and picked the wrong example, sorry for the noise.