From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:23:36 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2010, #01; Wed, 13)
Message-ID: <AANLkTimr73DUBBwdj9MXOQQ=O-vmyyEZpgwdHmRsGG_-@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v39s9fkk1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:46, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

>  - test-lib: make test_expect_code a test command
>
> Somewhat rerolled, but the largest one among the series was Nacked by a
> few people and needs to be rerolled again.

Why did you amend this to use this sed trick:

    +sed -e 's/Z$//' >expect <<\EOF &&
    +not ok - 1 tests clean up even after a failure
    +#      Z
    +#          touch clean-after-failure &&
    +#          test_when_finished rm clean-after-failure &&
    +#          (exit 1)
    +#      Z
    +not ok - 2 failure to clean up causes the test to fail
    +#      Z
    +#          test_when_finished \"(exit 2)\"
    +#      Z

Is it just to keep it diff --check clean?

Anyway if we munge the output like this the output of test_cmp will be
more confusing when it fails, because it'll be diff(1)-ing something
that the test-lib would never emit.

> * ab/i18n (2010-09-12) 159 commits

Could you please pick up the 160 commit version of this at:

    git://github.com/avar/git.git ab/i18n

It has the new "gettext.c: use libcharset.h instead of langinfo.h when
available" patch by Erik Faye-Lund and me, which would be nice to have
tested in pu.