From: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:11:18 GMT
Subject: Re: Git sideband hook output
Message-ID: <AANLkTimPI-A_4H-vYtHIyfbSLERDo0vu-kbB3Qu3ZT06@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3B9F4351-4608-455E-B433-A5337A946F8A@wincent.com>

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> wrote:
> El 11/06/2010, a las 16:34, PJ Hyett escribió:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If its really a problem, maybe "remote: " prefix should turn into
>>>> something shorter and language agnostic, like "<< ".  But thus far
>>>> we hadn't had to worry about it, since we didn't have translation
>>>> support in Git...  (though yes, I see that is changing now).
>>>>
>>
>> I'm also in favor of making the default '>>' instead of 'remote:' if
>> nothing isn't an option.
>
> Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from).
>

How about '> ', which often means "quote" (e.g in e-mails)? Would that
be appropriate?

-- 
Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund