From: Pavan Kumar Sunkara <pavan.sss1991@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:24:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] gitweb: Move subroutines to Gitweb::Config module
Message-ID: <AANLkTimKsdn8Vww_4U4YQDPlpr_BgbVszwG64lEYl-cE@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100608195552.GA3408@machine.or.cz>

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:52:11AM +0530, Pavan Kumar Sunkara wrote:
>> I am graining Gitweb::HTML into Gitweb::HTML::* to reduce circular
>> dependancies of the modules.
>
> I'm sorry, I don't understand. How is splitting up Gitweb::HTML to
> submodules helping to reduce circular dependencies? I don't quite see
> that right now. :-( Can you give a concrete example? Perhaps it would be
> better to refactor the few problematic users instead of convoluting the
> whole module structure because of the offenders.

Ok. I will be combining them into a single module.

>>   Gitweb::Parse
>
> What will this module do?

This module contains all the parse_* subroutines

Gitweb::Format contains all the format_* subroutines

>
>>   Gitweb::Util
>
> What will this module do?

This modules contains all the git utility functions.

>>   Gitweb::Action::* (All action subs like git_blame, git_log)
>
> Do we need to do this right now? I think moving huge chunks of the code
> around like this right now is unneccessary and it might just enlarge the
> patch queue and delay you in your main GSoC efforts; perhaps we could do
> this later when the dust settles a bit and we are sure that the rest of
> the modular structure we have introduced fits well?

I still have until this week in the timeline. Don't I ?
I strongly hope that I will be able to finalise the patch queue by
this week and will move on to develop write functionalities.

Thanks,
Pavan.