From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:02:12 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add Swedish translation.
Message-ID: <AANLkTim4M_KfuZoe5z_upPug5AT=P-_EfvPcxDe8-uPn@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C92227B.70800@drmicha.warpmail.net>

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 13:58, Michael J Gruber
<git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason venit, vidit, dixit 16.09.2010 13:41:
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:23, Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se> wrote:
>>> Robin Rosenberg:
>>>> (My comments are in swedish as it feels more natural in this context).
>>>
>>> While I do agree, I'm trying to reply in English since the Git list is in
>>> English.
>>
>> Usually yeah, but when a PO file is under discussion only people that
>> speak the language can contribute usefully anyway, so I think it's OK
>> if that discussion is not in English.
>
> How about "[L10N SE] etc." subject lines etc.? That way people can
> easily filter out all L10N posts but keep those relevant to them
> (including their language).

Sounds good, but convincing people to submit posts with those subjects
consistently is the hard part :)

> I'm trying to advocate "Marke" for DE ;)
> In fact, subversion seems to be a good source for inspiration - at least
> for the terms...

Yeah, languages that benefit from existing SCM translations should
definitely be looking at those, even if those SCM's aren't distributed
there's a lot of common vocabulary.